0
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Red Thaddeus D. Miguel |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
A systematic review and meta‑analysis of the association between e‑cigarette use among non‑tobacco users and initiating smoking of combustible cigarettes / Mimi M. Kim (2024)
Titre : A systematic review and meta‑analysis of the association between e‑cigarette use among non‑tobacco users and initiating smoking of combustible cigarettes Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Mimi M. Kim, Auteur ; Isabella Steffensen, Auteur ; Red Thaddeus D. Miguel, Auteur Editeur : Melbourne School of Population and Global Health Euan Lawson Année de publication : 2024 Collection : Harm Reduction Journal Importance : 33 p. Présentation : ill., tab., graph. Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [TABAC] CANDIDATS:e-cigarette
[TABAC] étude
[TABAC] étude:méta-analyse
[TABAC] sevrage tabagique:aide au sevrageIndex. décimale : TA 1.1.1 Cigarettes (« normales », électroniques, aromatisées,…) Résumé : Introduction
The rapid increase in e-cigarette use over the past decade has triggered an important public health question on the potential association between e-cigarette use and combustible cigarette smoking. Following AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA guidelines, this evidence synthesis sought to identify and characterize any associations
between e-cigarette use among individuals not smoking cigarettes and initiation of cigarette smoking. Methods The protocol was registered on September 24, 2018 (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018108540). Three databases were queried from January 01, 2007 to April 26, 2023. Search results were screened using the PICOS review method.
Results
Among 55 included studies (40 “good” and 15 “fair”; evidence grade: “high”) that adjusted for gender, age, and race/ethnicity between groups, generally, there was a significant association between non-regular e-cigarette use and initiation of cigarette smoking, further supported by the meta-analytic results (AOR 3.71; 95% CI 2.86–4.81). However, smoking initiation was most often measured as ever/current cigarette smoking. Two studies (quality: 2 “good”) evaluated progression to regular cigarette smoking among individuals with regular use of e-cigarettes, and generally found no significant associations. One study (“good”) evaluated smoking initiation among individuals with regular use of e-cigarettes, finding an increasing probability of ever smoking cigarettes with increased e-cigarette use. Twelve
studies (10 “good” and two “fair”) examining progression to regular smoking among individuals with non-regular use of e-cigarettes reported inconsistent findings.
Conclusions
Numerous methodological flaws in the body of literature limit the generalizability of these results to all individuals who are not smoking cigarettes with few studies measuring established/regular use/smoking of e-cigarettes and cigarettes. Further, studies did not control adequately for specific confounding variables representing common liabilities between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, nor did they account for sufficient follow-up durations. Collectively, these flaws limit the generalizability of findings to the question of an association between e-cigarette use
and cigarette smoking initiation.En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01013-x Format de la ressource électronique : Article en ligne Permalink : https://biblio.fares.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10302 Aucun avis, veuillez vous identifier pour ajouter le vôtre !