0
Détail d'une collection
|
Documents disponibles dans la collection (1)
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
Comparative risk perceptions of switching to JUUL vs. continued smoking and subsequent switching away from cigarettes / Arielle Seyla (2023)
Titre : Comparative risk perceptions of switching to JUUL vs. continued smoking and subsequent switching away from cigarettes : a longitudinal observational study Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Arielle Seyla, Auteur ; Saul Shiffman, Auteur Editeur : BioMed Central Année de publication : 2023 Collection : BMC Psychology Importance : 14 p. Présentation : tab., graph Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : [TABAC] CANDIDATS:e-cigarette
[TABAC] chimie du tabac:constituant:alcaloïde:nicotine
[TABAC] étude
[TABAC] sevrage tabagique:méthode de sevrage:méthode individuelle:approche pharmacologique
[TABAC] tabagisme:risqueMots-clés : juul Index. décimale : TA 1.1.1 Cigarettes (« normales », électroniques, aromatisées,…) Résumé : Background
Evidence indicates that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) pose lower risk than cigarettes; however, many smokers harbor misperceptions that ENDS are equally or more harmful, possibly deterring them from switching. This study examines whether comparative risk perceptions of JUUL vs. smoking are associated with subsequent switching, among smokers who recently purchased JUUL.
Methods
N = 16,996 current established smokers who recently purchased a JUUL Starter Kit were followed 6 times over 12 months. Comparative risk perceptions were assessed using both direct and indirect measures (i.e., contrasting JUUL and smoking directly in questions, and deriving from separate absolute scales). Repeated-measures logistic regression examined switching across follow-up (no smoking in past 30 days) as a function of baseline risk perceptions, adjusting for demographics and baseline smoking behavior.
Results
Perceiving JUUL as less harmful than smoking was associated with higher switching rates, using both direct (e.g., adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.48 for “JUUL much less” vs. “more/much more harmful”) and indirect (AOR = 1.07, for each 10-unit increase in fraction; AOR = 1.51 for highest (6-100) vs. lowest (0 to < 1) fraction categories) comparative risk measures (all p < 0.0001). Among the subset smoking 10 + cigarettes per day, associations between risk perceptions and switching were more pronounced (AOR = 2.51 for “JUUL much less” vs. “more/much more harmful”;
AOR = 1.81 for 6-100 vs. 0 to < 1 fraction, both p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Smokers who perceive JUUL as less harmful than cigarettes have higher odds of switching. Future research should examine whether messaging which aligns comparative risk perceptions with current evidence can facilitate switching, especially among heavier smokers.En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01351-8 Format de la ressource électronique : Article en ligne Permalink : https://biblio.fares.be/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10261 Aucun avis, veuillez vous identifier pour ajouter le vôtre !